Why businesses lose deals when sustainability data isn’t audit‑ready

In today’s procurement landscape, sustainability isn’t a checkbox, it’s a commercial reality. Buyers, investors, and enterprise partners aren’t just asking about environmental, social, and governance performance. They’re demanding audit‑ready ESG data that proves it.

When your sustainability data can’t stand up to scrutiny, the consequences extend beyond compliance risk. Deals stall, bids get rejected, and buyers move to competitors with credible records.

It’s determining who makes shortlists, who gets contracts, who gets renewed, and whether investors take you seriously. When you can’t back up your ESG claims with solid data, commercial partners stop trusting you, and that costs money.

This blog looks at why audit-ready ESG data has become a deal-maker or deal-breaker, where companies typically lose ground, and why the ones with credible data infrastructure are consistently winning more business.

Table of contents

Click on a specific section below to navigate to that area:

• 1. ESG data is now a commercial gatekeeper
• 2. Where ESG deals fall apart: common data failure points
• 3. Impact #1: lost trust during procurement and renewal
• 4. Impact #2: slower sales cycles and higher cost of sale
• 5. Impact #3: competitive disadvantage against prepared suppliers
• 6. What audit‑ready ESG data looks like 
• 7. How leading companies build audit-ready ESG data at scale

1. ESG data is now a commercial gatekeeper

Go back five years and sustainability questions in RFPs were the bit you answered last, usually with some vague commitments about reducing waste and aspirational net-zero targets. Now? They are scored the same way your technical response and pricing are scored. Get them wrong and you don’t make it to the next round.

Today’s buyers expect sustainability reporting accuracy they can verify. They want data they can trace back to source, evaluate against recognized standards, and rely on during audits.

When a buyer asks for sustainability evidence and you send them three different spreadsheets with inconsistent methodologies and a few educated guesses, they stop trusting you.

When your data doesn’t match their expectations, they don’t just ask follow‑ups. They pause deals, ask for third‑party verification, or even rule you out entirely.

2. Where ESG deals fall apart: common data failure points

Across manufacturing, construction, energy, logistics, and services sectors, sustainability data tends to break down in predictable ways:

• Fragmented spreadsheets across teams: Environmental data lives with operations. Social metrics sit with HR. Governance reporting stays in legal. When procurement asks for consolidated emissions data or labour practice metrics, there’s no single answer, just a scramble to make numbers align.
• Inconsistent methodologies year-to-year: Calculation approaches change when people leave or new software gets introduced. Without standardized processes, you end up comparing last year’s apples to this year’s oranges. Buyers and auditors see this immediately and flag it as unreliable reporting.
• Manual data collection errors: Hand-entered figures mean transcription errors or months get estimated. What should be a quick data request turns into days of chasing inputs and trying to validate sources after the fact.
• Missing audit trails or source evidence: When a buyer’s auditor asks how a figure was calculated and the answer involves going through old emails or someone who’s moved roles, that data isn’t audit-ready. Even if the underlying performance is solid, the inability to prove it kills credibility and stalls deals on the spot.

These aren’t minor admin issues. They directly undermine confidence in sustainability claims, even when the actual performance behind them is strong.

3. Impact #1: lost trust during procurement and renewal

Trust is a commercial currency. When buyers evaluate suppliers, they are not just looking for compliance. They are looking for confidence that the supplier can deliver on commitments, manage risk, and withstand scrutiny.

From their side – if you can’t manage your sustainability reporting properly, what else are you struggling with?

When your ESG data is inaccurate or unverifiable:

• Procurement teams hesitate or reject bids outright
• Buyers extend evaluation cycles with repeated clarification requests
• Renewal discussions pivot from strategic value to data justification

A buyer might like your pricing, delivery capability, and innovation, but if they can’t trust your ESG data, you’re probably not making the final shortlist. Unverified sustainability metrics represent misstatement risk, regulatory non-compliance risk, and reputational damage risk.  

Companies with audit-ready ESG data establish credibility from the start. They answer difficult questions with confidence instead of caveats, and in competitive procurement rounds, that distinction matters.

4. Impact #2: slower sales cycles and higher cost of sale

Beyond the lost deals, there’s the operational mess that poor ESG data creates for your revenue teams. Your salespeople should be closing deals. Instead they project managing internal data gathering.

The inability to respond swiftly with reliable sustainability information doesn’t just dent credibility. It creates operational drag that slows deal velocity and drives up the cost of sale. When a customer asks for emissions figures, scope breakdowns, or supplier risk scores, an unprepared organization faces:

• Last‑minute data scrambles across departments
• ESG questions routed through multiple approval layers
• Legal and compliance teams brought in to validate numbers late in the cycle

Each of these steps adds friction. What should be a straightforward data request becomes a bottleneck, Time is revenue in enterprise sales. Longer cycles mean slower cash flows, reduced forecast accuracy, and increased burden on sales and operations teams.

5. Impact #3: competitive disadvantage against prepared suppliers

While some companies are still wrestling with ESG data requests, others have made it a competitive weapon. The gap between prepared and unprepared suppliers is getting wider.

Buyers increasingly prefer suppliers who:

• Present consistent, traceable sustainability information
• Demonstrate compliance with CSRD, ESRS or equivalent standards
• Show documented evidence of methodologies, data sources, and governance

When customers see one supplier with data they trust and another with gaps, the choice becomes obvious. Prepared suppliers don’t just survive procurement reviews. They win them. Competitors who lag on data readiness risk being excluded from opportunities they should have won.

Audit-ready ESG data isn’t just protecting existing business. It’s opening doors that stay closed to competitors who can’t match that level of credibility.

6. What audit‑ready ESG data looks like

When buyers and auditors talk about “audit-ready ESG data,” they mean sustainability information that can withstand external verification without needing substantial rework or lengthy explanations. There are practical components to this.

• Clear, consistent methodologies: Define how each metric gets calculated (i.e. boundaries, conversion factors, data sources). Keep these consistent year-over-year unless there’s a documented reason. No methodology drift because someone new took over reporting.
• Complete data lineage: When a customer or auditor asks how you derived a number, the answer exists in documented form, not in someone’s head or buried in archived emails.
• Version control and accountability: Who entered the data? When? Based on what evidence? This lets you verify retrospectively without recreating entire reporting cycles from memory.
• Accessible, current data: Audit-ready data isn’t locked in last year’s annual report. It’s accessible and formatted so you can share it with stakeholders without weeks of reformatting.
• Consistency across frameworks: Whether a buyer wants ESRS disclosures or CDP responses, your underlying data aligns because it comes from one standardized source, not five different spreadsheets with five different methods.

This separates sustainability reporting that supports commercial outcomes from just checking a regulatory box. Without these elements, your ESG data isn’t ready for the scrutiny that modern deals demand.

7. How leading companies build audit-ready ESG data at scale

Companies getting competitive advantage from ESG data quality tend to use similar approaches. They don’t treat sustainability reporting as an annual compliance exercise and instead trat it like operational data that needs proper systems behind it.

Common patterns include:

• Centralized ESG data platforms: Single sources of truth that eliminate fragmented spreadsheets and version conflicts
• Standardized workflows: Agreed processes for data capture and validation across departments
• Automated data validation: Built‑in checks that flag anomalies before they reach buyers
• Secure, auditable records: Systems that maintain evidence, source documents, and data lineage

Sustainability reporting accuracy doesn’t just protect compliance. It protects revenue. When your ESG data isn’t audit‑ready, deals stall. Trust erodes. Competitors pass you by.

See how audit‑ready ESG data helps businesses win deals, retain customers, and compete with confidence. See how Infobip transformed their sustainability reporting with EcoOnline!

EcoOnline is the most efficient platform I’ve used for carbon accounting – intuitive, evidence-backed, and built by people who understand sustainability.

– MIHAELA TRČAK,
ESG Specialist

See the impact

50%

reduction in manual workload in the first year