What Is ALARP? Reducing risk to “As low as reasonably practicable”
ALARP is a core principle in safety risk management that means reducing risk to as low as reasonably practicable. In plain terms, you must control risks unless the sacrifice (in time, trouble or cost) is grossly disproportionate to the safety benefit. It’s rooted in UK health and safety law and guidance and underpins how high-risk work should be planned, controlled, and evidenced day to day. Done well, ALARP is where safety, compliance and productivity meet. You should put sensible, effective controls in place, prove they’re working, and keep operations moving.
Here, we unpack ALARP in practical terms, outline where manual paper processes fall short, and show how digital permit to work software makes ALARP more practicable, measurable and auditable.
Table of contents
Click on a specific section below to navigate to that area:
1. Understanding the ALARP principle
ALARP definition and legal background
The duty to protect people “so far as is reasonably practicable” sits at the heart of UK health and safety law in the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. Practically, it means balancing the level of risk against the measures needed to control it. In other words, you’re not expected to eliminate all risk, but you must do everything that’s reasonably practicable to prevent harm. If a precaution offers clear risk reduction and isn’t grossly disproportionate in cost or effort, you should implement it. In safety-critical work, ALARP is the test that turns “good intentions” into evidence-based controls.
“As low as reasonably practicable” is used by the HSE in guidance and by ISO risk management standards. Regulators and inspectors apply ALARP in routine risk assessments and in major hazard regimes such as COMAH. They expect duty-holders to show that risks are controlled to ALARP with solid evidence. This includes clear risk assessments, safe systems of work, and auditable permit-to-work records for high-risk tasks.
Why ALARP matters in high-risk industries
Construction, utilities, manufacturing and facilities management all involve work with high-consequence hazards (for example, hot work, confined space entry and electrical isolation). Applying ALARP here means selecting the right controls (e.g., isolations, gas testing, fire watch, rescue planning, competence checks) and showing they’re in place before the job starts. Permit-to-work is the practical mechanism that ties those controls to the task, the people and the time window.
In short: ALARP turns into action when risk controls are designed into work and traceable, and that’s precisely where permits (and especially digital permits) earn their keep.
2. The challenge of achieving ALARP in practice
Manual processes and paper permits
Even well-designed paper permit-to-work (PTW) systems buckle under real-world pressure. Multiple contractors on site, shifting scopes, and time-critical maintenance all make a paper system extremely hard to manage. What looks compliant at the start of the shift can collapse by midday as forms multiply and handovers blur. In that chaos, three weaknesses tend to surface again and again:
- 1. Completeness and consistency: Forms can be skipped, copied or misfiled and key precautions vary person-to-person.
- 2. Proof: After an incident or audit, assembling evidence that risk was ALARP is slow and unreliable.
- 3. Control: It’s hard to ensure that training, isolations, and checks actually occurred when the only “system” is a clipboard.
The HSE’s guidance on permit-to-work highlights the purpose of PTW (formal control of hazardous maintenance and coordination of simultaneous activities) and points to common failure modes when PTW is weak. These weaknesses are exactly what make ALARP hard to demonstrate with paper.
Gaps in visibility and real-time control
ALARP depends on situational awareness. In busy sites, the biggest blind spot isn’t a single job, rather it’s how jobs interact with each other. Without a live, shared view of all active and planned permits, you can miss SIMOPS risks (for example, hot work near a confined space entry). PTW is explicitly intended to coordinate activities to avoid such conflicts, but doing that effectively requires more than just a noticeboard.
3. How digital permit-to-work systems support ALARP
Digital permit to work software bakes ALARP into everyday workflows. It standardises controls, verifies competence, gives real-time visibility, and leaves an audit-ready trail of who approved what, when and why. It gives you the evidence regulators and insurers expect, so you’re always ready to show compliance.
Embedding risk controls into the workflow
Modern systems guide users through hazard identification and required controls for the permit type (hot work, confined space, electrical), making critical checks mandatory before issue. They also support RAMS (risk assessments and method statements) attachments and training/competence verification so that only authorised workers are named on high-risk permits. This is the essence of “reasonable practicability” operationalised. You cannot proceed until the proportionate controls are in place and recorded.
Digital PTW systems offer automated approval workflows, fast e-signatures, contractor compliance checks, staged permit lifecycle (request–approve–issue–close), and centralised evidence. These systems reduce human error and admin, raising assurance that the controls you say you have are the ones being used.
Real-time visibility and audit trails
A digital PTW gives you dashboards of live permits, status alerts (e.g., pending approvals, expiring permits), and a tamper-evident log of actions. You can retrieve the full chain (risk assessment, isolations, approvals, extensions) instantly. For ALARP, this matters. You can show that proportionate measures were selected, implemented and monitored (not just assert it after the fact). HSE guidance emphasises the value of robust PTW systems and monitoring, and digital tools make that monitoring continuous and auditable.
Preventing overlaps and unsafe work (SIMOPS detection)
The best digital PTW platforms check for permit clashes automatically. If someone raises hot work in an area where electrical maintenance is scheduled, the system flags or blocks it until risks are resolved. The HSE stresses that PTW is a coordination tool to prevent conflicts. Some guidance also calls out combined/simultaneous operations as conditions that demand particular attention to PTW. Digital systems operationalise that expectation every day.
4. ALARP and operational excellence: two sides of the same coin
From compliance to continuous improvement
Chasing ALARP isn’t just about avoiding incidents. It unlocks operational excellence. You can expect fewer delays, cleaner handovers, lower rework and smoother shutdowns/turnarounds. When PTW is digital, approvals speed up, status is clear, and coordination improves, reducing downtime without relaxing controls. IOSH’s work on digitalisation and OSH echoes this dual benefit: the right technologies make work safer and more efficient by improving monitoring, decision-making and learning.
When your evidence is one click away, audits and client assurance are faster and less disruptive. That frees leaders to focus on improvements, not paper-chasing.
Building a culture of “reasonable practicability”
ALARP lives or dies on culture. Leaders have to show that nothing their workers do is worth someone getting hurt, and systems should make the right way the easy way. The HSE repeatedly links strong outcomes to consistent management, competence and communications, which are exactly the variables a well-run PTW drives, from standardised checklists to clear accountability. When people see that approvals, checks and close-outs are visible and shared, they tend to follow them, and speak up when something’s off.
5. How to apply ALARP in your organisation
ALARP becomes real when it shapes everyday work. Focus on steady habits that everyone can follow. Know where the biggest risks are, put the right controls in place, and create clear evidence that those controls were used at the point of work. Do this consistently and you’ll satisfy regulators and insurers, build confidence across your organisation, and most importantly keep people safe while the job gets done.
Here’s a practical five-step starting point for ops and safety leaders:
- 1. Identify and assess high-risk work: Map your top-exposure tasks (hot work, confined space, energised work, work at height, excavation). Use a simple, consistent risk methodology that’s suitable and sufficient under UK law and prioritise by consequence and likelihood.
- 2. Implement practical controls first: Apply the hierarchy of controls and relevant HSE guidance (e.g., confined spaces ACOP, safe isolation). Document what’s required for each permit class and make it standard practice before anyone starts.
- 3. Use permit-to-work software for traceability: Move from paper to a digital permit to work platform. Enforce mandatory checks, verify training/authorisations, and centralise records. This creates the proof that risks were reduced as low as reasonably practicable at the point of work.
- 4. Review incidents and near misses regularly: Close the loop. After action reviews should ask: were further reasonably practicable measures available? Update templates, checklists and controls accordingly. Continuous review is part of staying ALARP as conditions and knowledge evolve.
- 5. Continuously improve based on data: Use your PTW data to spot where permits stall, which controls are added late, where SIMOPS conflicts recur. Feed those insights into your operations and your training plan for increased EHS efficiency.
6. Final Thoughts
ALARP shouldn’t be viewed as some abstract theory. It should be a daily operating principle for your business. The expectation (especially in high-risk work) is that you do what’s sensible and proportionate every time, and that you can prove it. That’s exactly what permit to work software like ePermits provide: visibility, control, compliance, and measurable progress in reducing risk while keeping work moving safely. For operations managers, site managers and safety leaders, it is the practical bridge between risk management and operational excellence.
About the author
Stephanie Fuller
Content Writer